dc.description.abstract |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been developed as a
feasible tool for agricultural surveillance. Despite the fact that many
researchers have focused on UAVs' ability to offer information on crop
growth and development, study on the efficacy of day time period for
images is extremely uncommon. As a result, the purpose of this
research was to assess the best flying duration for RGB-based UAV
technology for field crop monitoring and to develop a procedure for
monitoring sugarcane using UAVs in Sri Lanka. The study was
conducted on a five-month-old sugarcane field (1 hectare) in Ampara,
Sri Lanka. All flights were missioned using a DJI Mavic pro drone (RGB)
at flying heights, speeds, frontal overlap, and lateral overlap of 50 m, 4
m/s, 75%, and 70%, respectively. During the experiment day, images
were captured during three flying time periods: T1 (07:00 – 09:00 h), T2
(10:00 – 12:00 h), and T3 (13:00 – 15:00 h), with three replicates per
flight, and plant density (PD) data were manually recorded for 19 plots
(5m×5m). The orthomosaic images were processed using Agisoft
PhotoScan software, and the classification and accuracy assessments
were carried out using Arc GIS to generate vegetation fraction (VF) and
Green-red vegetation index (GRVI) values. To determine the optimal
flying time, a relationship between UAV-based VF and plant density
(PD) was generated. T2 performed better in vegetation mapping, with
an overall accuracy of 88.37% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.75, because
more shadowing regions were identified on the other two flights. At T2,
the most significant correlation between VF and manual plant density
was detected (R2 = 82.9%, SE = 2.20, P<0.05). T2 demonstrated a very
strong relation between GRVI and PD (R2 = 82.1%, SE = 2.25, P<0.05).
Overall, the ideal flight time can give more accurate and accurate crop
monitoring results. The study concludes that the time range 10:00 –
12:00h might be used to acquire UAV images for crop monitoring.
Keywords
Plant Density, Vegetation Index, Flying
time, image classification, vegetation
analysis
*Corresponding Author
Email:[email protected]
1. Introduction
Agricultural monitoring on a regular basis is
essential for addressing field constraints such as
field gap detection, pest and disease concerns,
weed management, and water stress issues in crop
cultivations, resulting in enhanced production [1].
Traditional visual inspection is less productive since
it involves more effort, money, and time. Precision
farming technology has lately emerged as one of the
most potential substitutes for manual crop
monitoring [2].Satellite remote sensing imagery
outperforms conventional crop monitoring methods
[1,3]. However, it has certain disadvantages, such
as lower spatial resolution, cloud cover, |
en_US |